Enhancing dma-buf Subsystem: Toward Efficient User-Space Read/Write Operations

By

Introduction

The Linux kernel's dma-buf subsystem has long been a cornerstone for efficient memory buffer sharing between drivers, particularly for device-to-device I/O. At the 2026 Linux Storage, Filesystem, Memory Management, and BPF Summit (LSFMM+BPF), a joint session led by Pavel Begunkov, with assistance from Kanchan Joshi, delved into proposals to make dma-buf usage more efficient and, crucially, to enable read and write operations directly from user space. This article explores the dma-buf subsystem, its current limitations, and the path toward a more versatile I/O interface.

Enhancing dma-buf Subsystem: Toward Efficient User-Space Read/Write Operations

What is dma-buf?

The dma-buf framework provides a standardized way for kernel drivers to share memory buffers that are mapped for Direct Memory Access (DMA). It abstracts the underlying memory allocation and synchronization, allowing multiple drivers (e.g., a GPU and a network card) to exchange data without copying. This zero-copy approach is essential for high-throughput applications like video streaming, machine learning inference, and storage offload.

Traditionally, dma-buf focused on exporter-importer relationships: a driver that creates the buffer (exporter) passes a file descriptor to another driver (importer), which then maps the buffer into its own I/O address space. User-space processes could only interact with dma-bufs indirectly, via ioctl() calls or by attaching the buffer to a graphics context—there was no native mechanism for reading from or writing to a dma-buf using standard file I/O operations like read() or write().

Current Limitations

The absence of direct read/write support creates several inefficiencies:

The Need for Read/Write Operations

Enabling read() and write() on dma-buf file descriptors would allow user-space applications to treat dma-bufs as regular files, leveraging the kernel's page cache, buffer management, and asynchronous I/O subsystems. This would unlock several use cases:

The 2026 LSFMM+BPF Summit Discussion

At the summit, Pavel Begunkov and Kanchan Joshi presented a proposal to add a read/write I/O path to the dma-buf subsystem. Key points included:

Proposed Solutions and Benefits

The summit attendees discussed several technical approaches:

  1. Extending the dma-buf file operations: Implement the read_iter and write_iter file_operations in the dma-buf core, with a fallback to a generic copy that respects the buffer's caching attributes.
  2. Using scatter-gather lists: For multiple disjoint memory regions within a dma-buf, the I/O path would operate on scatterlists to maintain efficient DMA mappings.
  3. Fence integration: Any read/write operation would automatically attach a fence that completes only after the buffer is no longer in use by hardware, avoiding stale data consumption.

Benefits include:

Future Directions

While the session was largely exploratory, it set the stage for concrete patches. Challenges remain, such as handling cache coherency on architectures with non-coherent DMA, and defining the exact semantics when multiple readers/writers share a buffer. The community is expected to continue the discussion on the linux-mm and linux-fsdevel mailing lists.

As the dma-buf subsystem evolves, it will likely become a key enabler for heterogeneous computing and disaggregated hardware, where user-space processes frequently need to move data among accelerators, storage, and networking devices with minimal overhead.

Conclusion

The proposal to add read and write support to dma-bufs, as debated at LSFMM+BPF 2026, represents a natural progression of Linux's memory management and I/O capabilities. By allowing user-space to read from and write to shared DMA buffers using standard file operations, the kernel can simplify programming models, reduce data copies, and improve performance in a wide range of modern workloads. With leaders like Pavel Begunkov and Kanchan Joshi driving the effort, the Linux community is poised to deliver another powerful tool for high-performance computing.

Tags:

Related Articles

Recommended

Discover More

The Real Reasons Python Apps Are So Hard to Package as Standalone Executables5 Key Facts About the Cyberattack That Took Down Ubuntu Websites and Snap StoreHow Wind and Solar Saved UK £1.7 Billion in Gas Imports Since Iran ConflictYour Guide to Joining the Python Security Response Team (PSRT)How to Spot a Weak Consumer Privacy Bill: Lessons from the SECURE Data Act